I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
В Мозамбике крокодилы за один день напали на двух человек на реке Лугела. Об этом сообщает издание Club of Mozambique.
，详情可参考搜狗输入法2026
（九）提供区块链服务的，应当采取监测发现、防范、阻断、处置在区块链上发布、传播违法信息、病毒木马、恶意程序或者为违法犯罪活动提供支付结算等帮助的措施；，这一点在51吃瓜中也有详细论述
Жители Санкт-Петербурга устроили «крысогон»17:52